Supreme Court Ruling Abortion

Supreme Court Ruling Abortion: It is possible that the Supreme Court of the United States may soon make it possible for individual states to outlaw or severely limit the ability of pregnant women to have abortions.

In the case known as Roe v. Wade, which was heard by the Supreme Court in 1973, the justices decided that women who became pregnant had the right to have an abortion during the first three months of their pregnancy. However, they allowed for legal restrictions and bans on abortions during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

Supreme Court Ruling Abortion
Supreme Court Ruling Abortion

However, a draft of their upcoming judgment that has been leaked implies that the court is likely to overrule that previous finding, which would essentially make it permissible for states to restrict abortions earlier than 12 weeks into a pregnancy. It is anticipated that the decision will be made later on this month.

If this were to occur, the United States would not immediately adopt a policy that criminalizes abortion; rather, it would be up to each individual state to choose whether or not it would be lawful to perform abortions and under what circumstances.

To participate in the festivities, the Attorney General was there. The day that the United States Supreme Court would hear her state’s appeal to Roe v. Wade, the verdict from 1973 that has, in the almost 50 years since it was handed down, functioned as a countrywide guarantee to access to abortion services, had just been announced.

The legal dispute known as Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is on a proposed rule in Mississippi that, if passed, would make it illegal to perform an abortion after the 15th week of pregnancy, even in situations involving rape or incest.

Supreme Court Ruling Abortion
Supreme Court Ruling Abortion

Ms. Fitch was the one who directed the state to make the request to the Supreme Court, and she wanted the court to maintain the legislation while simultaneously overturning the precedent-setting Roe v. Wade ruling. A decision is anticipated to be made this month. According to a draft that was discovered to have been leaked, it is very possible that Mississippi’s prohibition would be sustained, which will open the door for other states to likewise restrict abortion.

What Supreme Court ruling removed the states ban on abortion?

Ms. Fitch, who refused to be interviewed, had previously stated that overturning Roe v. Wade would be “game-changing,” “uplifting,” and “empowering” for women because it would eliminate what she regarded as a false choice between family and profession.

“Back in the 1960s, if you were a career woman, they expected you to choose one path or the other. You do not need to do that anymore, “she said in an article for Pro-Life Weekly. “In life, you have the opportunity to really accomplish your ambitions and realize your objectives, and you also have the chance to have those lovely children.”

Advocates for women’s rights to choose their reproductive health care say that if she prevails in the lawsuit and Roe v. Wade is overturned, as many as 40 million women might lose their right to seek abortion services. Ms. Fitch, who is a single working mom of three children, has the potential to become a Republican sensation and the poster child for her own thesis, which is that contemporary women do not need abortion in order to have it all.

My understanding of abortion is complicated by the fact that I was one of the last two Republicans in the House of Representatives to vote in favor of women’s reproductive rights.
During the period that I served in Congress, I cast my vote against prohibiting abortions beyond 20 weeks and against defunding Planned Parenthood. That was to the satisfaction of pro-choice supporters. However, there were pro-life supporters who were satisfied with some aspects of my voting record.

Supreme Court Ruling Abortion
Supreme Court Ruling Abortion

For instance, I voted in favor of the time-honored Hyde Amendment phrasing that is included in legislation pertaining to government expenditures. This phrase makes it illegal for the federal government to pay for abortions, with the exception of situations involving rape, incest, and the life or health of the mother. Continue reading.

Charlie Dent, a former Republican congressman from Pennsylvania, served as the chair of the House Ethics Committee from 2015 until 2017 and as the chair of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies from 2015 until 2018. Both of these positions were held simultaneously. He provides commentary on politics on CNN.

What happens if Roe v Wade overturned?

According to Hayes Dent, a long-time friend and colleague of hers who managed her first political campaign, her upbringing and the experiences she had as a single mother had a significant impact on the convictions she holds today.

When Mr. Dent first encountered Ms. Fitch, she had just been appointed to the position of executive director of a state body called the Mississippi State Personnel Board by the governor of the state at the time, Haley Barbour. Almost immediately, Mr. Dent was taken aback.

Mr. Dent is quoted as saying, “Having been around every important political person in Mississippi for the last 40 years, I could simply tell: she’s going to run for office.” “When she finally pulls the trigger, she’s going to have a good outcome.”

She did not begin her bid for state treasurer for another couple of years, at which point she did announce her candidacy.

“She was an underdog” when she ran for state treasurer in 2011, her first political campaign, according to Austin Barbour, a national GOP strategist and the nephew of former Governor Barbour.

Mister Dent, who had been following Ms. Fitch for some time, made contact with her in the midst of the election season in 2011 and asked if he might join her campaign.

He remembers saying something to the effect of, “Look, I believe you can win this race.”

She agreed to it. The two individuals would leave early in the morning and travel the length of the state in a single day, stopping at a variety of locations along the way and making phone calls to potential donors during the hours in between.

“Her outlook was to question, ‘What is the work at hand?'” Mr. Dent said. “It would be something along the lines of “Look, we have to go to the tobacco spitting festival.” And she’d be fantastic at it! Even though she wouldn’t spit tobacco, she was a wonderful person.”

Supreme Court Ruling Abortion
Supreme Court Ruling Abortion

In the case West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, the central issue is whether or not the federal government has the authority to draft environmental rules. The opponents consist of a coalition of 27 Republican attorneys general, many of whom are from states with deep roots in the fossil fuel sector, such as West Virginia.

The crux of their argument is that the executive department of the federal government, which includes the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), should not be given the authority to establish rules and regulations concerning greenhouse gas emissions. They argue that the responsibility for doing so should lie with Congress.

The Clean Power Plan, which was enacted under the Obama administration, and the Affordable Clean Energy rule, which was enacted during the Trump administration, are neither of the real policies at the center of the dispute at this time.

Despite this, a decision with far-reaching implications would make it more difficult for the federal government to fight climate change by limiting the emissions of greenhouse gases.

Roberts voted in favor of allowing the Texas law to go into effect; however, he stated that once the court ruled that the measure was too burdensome, the court shouldn’t rule the other way in Louisiana just because Kennedy left the court and was replaced by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh is currently serving on the court.

It is possible that if the court issues a ruling that sustains Mississippi’s 15-week restriction but pretends to keep Roe in place, this will prevent the court from being the focal point of demonstrations over abortion during the hot summer months. Kate Shaw, a law professor at Cardozo, pointed out that one of Chief Justice Roberts’ aims has been to do all in his power to keep the Supreme Court out of the political limelight.

Similar Posts